Friday, April 6, 2018

CROW and the CAVE -- Who Dun It? -- Part Two


Figure One - What do you call these High Plains surface finds? I call them Allen points. The three critical attributes
I used to identify were; 1). Pronounced basal concavity, 2). Carefully executed diagonal flaking, and
3). Edge grinding. Longest point is 3.2 inches. John Branney Collection.    
Identifying Paleoindian projectile points by type on the High Plains is often more art than science. Deciding what kind of projectile point is in your hands can lead to some hand wringing, especially for those projectile points that are somewhere ‘between’ two known projectile point types. One of the more confusing array of Paleoindian projectile points are those with indented bases. For decades, people threw all indented base projectile points into two buckets; Clovis if it had flutes and Plainview if did not have flutes. The differences between the various indented base projectile points made by Paleoindians are  subtle. An indented based Paleoindian projectile point can be Clovis, Goshen, Plainview, Allen, St. Mary's Hall, Dalton, Belen, or Midland. Am I missing any? Figure One shows a group of these indented base points. What type do you think they are?

The similarities between projectile point types can be striking and the differences subtle. I have seen two identical projectile points made with the same technology with similar age called different point types just because they were found in adjoining regions of the country. This is precisely why I do not get hung up on a name. In my opinion, we have gone way overboard on naming projectile point types. It appears to me that naming a new projectile point has become a feather in the cap for some people and that those people have gone out of their way in finding differences in projectile points, and not the similarities to an already existing projectile point type.    
Figure Two - The Texas Panhandle point on the left is 
called Plainview while the northern Colorado point 
on the right is called Goshen. Can you tell the difference? 
I can't. Longest point is 2.4 inches.
John Branney Collection.  


For this article, I am staying out of the politics of proposing a new projectile point. It is almost impossible for an amateur archaeologist to have a new projectile point named and recognized. Professionals have a forum for naming and documenting new projectile point types and there is still a lot of politics. It can work the other way as well, i.e. denying the existence of an existing projectile point type. Texas archaeologists have denied the existence of Agate Basin points in Texas as if a future border stopped the Agate Basin people from entering future Texas. I have found and seen Agate Basin points in Texas, but since professional archaeologists have not found them, they do not exist. I digressed to the very topic I wrote I would avoid. ;).    

Imagine that you and I discovered a new prehistoric site while surface hunting. We are finding a different style of projectile point that we have never seen. Since these are surface finds, we do not know the age or the prehistoric culture they come from. These projectile points look kind of like an existing projectile point type, but they are not a complete match. Our projectile points have a couple of features that make them different to the existing projectile point type. We wonder if we have found a new projectile point type.    


Selecting and recognizing the critical attributes in a series of projectile points can be difficult and subjective. At one extreme, we focus on general attributes and fit our group of projectile points into an existing projectile point type. At the other extreme, we focus on the minute differences and variations that distance our group of projectile points from an existing projectile point type.
Figure Three - What would you call these surface found projectile points? I call them Midland points
based on these three attributes; 1). Thin, 2). Indented to flat bases, and 3). Fine, abrupt, non invasive
pressure retouch forming regular and straight margins. Longest point is 2.5 inches.
John Branney Collection   
If the descriptions for existing projectile point types are too tight and rigid, we end up with a plethora of new projectile point types that might only reflect differences in craftsmanship or workmanship, not prehistoric culture. If the descriptions for existing projectile point types are too loose and flexible, we might accept large variations that may actually reflect a change in technology or prehistoric culture. 

Bottom line is; IT IS ONLY A NAME. You might even disagree with what I called the projectile points above. I have no problem with that. The critical item in projectile point identification is doing the homework required to identify your Paleoindian projectile point to the best of your ability.

In case you missed "Part I", CLICK the LINK, and if you want to join my Folsom People adventures CLICK the LINK under my book covers. You will be glad you did. 

                  CROW and the CAVE - WHO DUN IT? - PART I   

Tuesday, April 3, 2018

CROW and the CAVE – Who Dun It? – Part One


Figure One - Four thousand years of High Plains projectile point evolution. From left to right; Clovis, Goshen,
Folsom, Agate Basin, Hell Gap, and Scottsbluff (3.95 inches long). I see a fundamental change in style
from Folsom to Agate Basin. John Branney Collection.   
Amateur and professional archaeologists spend lots of time studying and categorizing High Plains Paleoindian projectile points by technology and type. These projectile point types are associated with specific Paleoindian cultures or complexes, such as Clovis or Folsom. Did the overall Paleoindian culture change between Clovis and Folsom or was it just the projectile point style? Humans seek order and simplicity from disorder and complexity. We identify and classify items that are important to us. When we find a Paleoindian projectile point, the first question is 'who dun it'? We want to know how our projectile point fits into the overall scheme of Paleoindian projectile point types. We want an orderly projectile point sequence or evolution from Clovis Complex to Goshen Complex to  Folsom Complex to Agate Basin Complex to Hell Gap Complex to Cody Complex.
Figure TwoCLICK for INFORMATION

In some cases, Paleoindian life seemed quite simple; survival was the only game. The details of what life was like ten or twelve thousand years ago is impossible to unravel from our spotty archaeological record. The prehistory of Paleoindians on the High Plains is like a thousand and one piece jigsaw puzzle. On a jigsaw puzzle there is the picture of the completed puzzle on the box and inside the box are a thousand and one pieces. Each piece by itself tells us little about the overall puzzle. If I compare these puzzle pieces to the archaeological record, it is similar. We never have a complete picture. We are limited to the puzzle pieces or archaeological data we find and interpret. We might have three puzzle pieces from this corner and four pieces from that corner, but we never have a complete picture. By using various scientific disciplines and the best "Sherlock Holmes" imitation, archaeologists and investigators piece together an incomplete Paleoindian prehistory.

While bone, fabric, and flesh deteriorate in the elements, stone projectile points hold their own, somewhat. We are guilty of using projectile point type as the be-all-to-end-all to identify and differentiate Paleoindian cultures or complexes. What if Paleoindians used more than one projectile point type at the same time and in the same place? That throws a wrench in the orderly sequence of projectile points we all know and love.            

Ruthanne Knudson (2017) wrote it best;  


"Perhaps, the typological labeling of points has resulted in
artificial confusion of “different” complexes when indeed
people living together made differently designed
points at the same time.”        


Bravo! It is amazing how one sentence can explain and reinforce a belief on the subject of Paleoindian projectile points. Based on current evidence, who can say that there weren’t a few innovative Paleoindians who made Clovis and Goshen-like projectile points at the same time, or that Folsom hunters did not experiment with Agate Basin projectile points? Projectile points are an excellent 'broad brush' technique for identifying Paleoindian cultures, but we must be wary to not to let the tail wag the dog. Based on our current understanding, we know that from the Clovis Complex to the Cody Complex, large mammal procurement was the main survival economy of Paleoindians, only the style of projectile points and some of the prey changed over time. As more pieces of the Paleoindian puzzle are found, we will fill in more of that cover on the puzzle box.  
  
Figure Three - Paleoindians probably spent most of their time trying to survive.
They would probably wonder why 'we' spend so much time and effort 
studying their stone projectile points.  

Knudson, Ruthann
2017    “The Plainview Assemblage in Context” in Plainview: The Enigmatic Paleoindian Artifact Style of the Great Plains. The University of Utah Press. Salt Lake City.   


Figure FourCLICK for Latest Paleoindian Adventure from John Bradford Branney

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

CROW and the CAVE - Was it Super Predator or Scavenger?


Figure One - Arctodus simus, the giant short-faced bear.  
One of the messages I convey in my prehistoric adventure book series titled the SHADOW on the TRAIL Quadrilogy is that Paleoindians on the High Plains had a tough life. They not only had to deal with the ongoing search for food and water, but they also had to deal with disasters, both natural and intentional, such as earthquakes, tornadoes, and wildfires. One of the other things that Paleoindians had to deal with were animal predators. On good days, Paleoindians were at the top of the food chain, but there were a few bad days where the hunters became the hunted. With sharp spears to defend themselves, Paleoindians had formidable animal adversaries. 
    

In my newly released prehistoric adventure CROW and the CAVE, I use a super animal predator for the first time as 'one of the good guys'. A short book passage from CROW and the CAVE

A short-faced bear, taller than the tallest bison, burst out of the cave. The bear stood outside the cave, growling and peering around. Smoke billowed from its den. The warriors stood paralyzed, a couple of them defecating on the spot. None had ever seen such a monster. The bear glared at them while sniffing the air. It opened its massive jaws and tilted its head to the side. Its yellow teeth glinted in the winter sun.

The now-extinct short-faced bear was quite a specimen. Based on fossilized remains, it is estimated to have stood five and a half feet tall at its shoulders, high enough to look a Paleoindian squarely in the eyes. It was ten-foot long and if it stood on its hind legs like modern bears, a good-sized male stood eleven to twelve feet with a fourteen-foot vertical arm reach. It is estimated that a good-sized male could weigh as much as two thousand pounds. Males were around fifteen percent larger than females. The size of the animals fluctuated, perhaps adhering to Bergmann’s Rule which states that populations and species of larger size are found in colder environments, and species of smaller size are found in warmer regions.  
Figure Three - Not sure if this is quite to scale,
but you get the idea. The Giant Short-Faced Bear was
not a laughing matter.   

The giant short-faced bear preferred the open, drier grasslands west of the Mississippi River. So far, its remains have been found from Alaska and the Yukon south into Mexico, from Pennsylvania west to California.

The giant short-faced bear had short faces and wide muzzles resembling more of a big cat than a modern bear. It was also less pigeon toed than modern-day brown or black bears. It walked in a straight line versus waddling like brown or black bears. Scientists estimate that the giant short-faced bear could run between thirty and forty miles per hour, fast enough to run down most animals.

Was the giant short-faced bear a super predator or a super scavenger? That’s a question that scientists debate. The nitrogen 15 to nitrogen 14 ratios from its remains indicates it was a carnivore. One estimate puts its consumption at around thirty-five pounds of meat per day. From its power jaws and large teeth, it devoured anything it wanted. From its estimated speed, it could run down wild horses and antelope, at least in a short sprint.

Current evidence shows that the giant short-faced bear was around until about 11,000 years ago. Even though CROW and the CAVE took place around 10,700 years ago, I used the giant short-faced bear, based on my belief that we have yet to uncover the last survivor of ANY extinct species. Read the SHADOWS on the TRAIL Quadrilogy for the rest of the story.   
CLICK for Other JOHN BRADFORD BRANNEY Books
  

     

        

Monday, March 12, 2018

 New Historical Fiction Novel by John Bradford Branney breathes life into Prehistoric America


CLICK to BUY CROW and the CAVE
Fans of the popular Shadows on the Trail book series by bestselling author John Bradford Branney are gobbling up copies of his latest adventure, Crow and the Cave 

The historical fiction novels written by John Bradford Branney are known for their impeccable research and biting realism. In his latest blockbuster novel Crow and the Cave, Author Branney catapults his readers into Prehistoric America where they reunite with some familiar faces from Branney’s best-selling prehistoric adventure series the Shadows on the Trail Trilogy.

Hailed for its accurate depiction of life in Prehistoric America, Crow and the Cave is a fast-paced read that accurately builds on clues from the archaeological record and oral traditions practiced by early Americans. What makes Crow and the Cave even more compelling is the inspiration for the story. Crow and the Cave rose from a life-threatening accident that left Author Branney and his German Shepherd Madd Maxx crippled and bleeding on a remote ranch.  Not one to miss an opportunity to tell a story, Branney recounted this incident in the context of a Paleoindian named Hoka in Prehistoric America. This catastrophic event burst forth on the pages of Crow and the Cave.

Hogan and Cansha

John Bradford Branney has shown meticulous attention to detail and a consummate familiarity with the high plains of Prehistoric America in Crow and the Cave. Branney has again shown why he is one of the preeminent, authoritative, and technically-superb writers of this genre. Readers will relish every page of Crow and the Cave.    

John Bradford Branney holds a geology degree from the University of Wyoming and MBA from the the University of Colorado. John lives in the Colorado mountains with his wife, Theresa. Crow and the Cave is the eighth published book by Branney.
Copies of Crow and the Cave are available at all major booksellers, including Black Rose Writing, Amazon, and Barnes & Noble.
CLICK for CROW and the CAVE



Wednesday, March 7, 2018

CROW and the CAVE - Cannibalism in Prehistoric America.


Figure One - Scene of cannibalism in Brazil in 1644 by Jan van Kessel
One of the most frequently asked questions about my prehistoric adventure series the SHADOWS on the TRAIL TRILOGY is about cannibalism in prehistoric times. In my first book SHADOWS on the TRAIL, which took place around 10,700 years ago, I introduced human sacrifice and cannibalism. I introduced these practices in my book for its shock appeal, but also because I believe that both happened in prehistoric times. Don't get me wrong, I do not believe human sacrifice and cannibalism were dominant cultural practices in Prehistoric America, but archaeological evidence indicates that it did happen, and we have to acknowledge that. We know that human sacrifice and cannibalism was documented by the Spaniards in Central and South America in early historical times.

Below is a passage from my first book SHADOWS on the TRAIL where a priest called Sica performs a human sacrifice on a slave and then the flesh from that human sacrifice was consumed by the people of the village. A huntress called Namid responds in horror at the end of the passage.  

While praying and chanting, Sica pulled out a long obsidian knife blade from his robe and held it high. The woman struggled and the three warriors held her against the granite boulder, attempting to hold her still. Sica then turned the knife blade downward in his outstretched arms and plunged the knife blade deep into the chest of the woman. The woman’s body violently jerked upwards when the knife penetrated her lungs, followed by a muffled gasp. Sica pulled the knife from her chest. He had stabbed the woman with such force that the knife blade had snapped in two. He pulled a second obsidian knife from his robe and cut the woman’s flesh below her sternum with the sharp blade. He quickly sawed a large hole in her flesh, probing under the woman’s rib cage with the knife blade and his other hand. Finally, he found the woman’s heart and cut the flesh around it. He pulled the woman’s heart from her body and raised it to the sky. He then put the heart to his mouth and bit off a large piece of it. Some of the people in the crowd cheered while Sica, blood dripping down his chin, smiled at the crowd with delight. To'sarre stood rigid, disgusted with what he had just witnessed.

“STOP!” Namid shrieked. “NO!”

Not every one agrees that cannibalism existed in prehistoric times. In his 1979 book, The Man Eating Myth, author William Arens stated that "There is limited evidence for the possibility of cannibalism in prehistoric times." Arens believed that
Figure Two - CLICK for John Bradford Branney Books
cannibalism was only related to isolated starvation situations, much like the snowbound Donner Party in 1846-47.        

Since Mr. Arens researched and wrote his book, archaeologists have discovered more evidence for cannibalism during prehistoric times. Just do an internet search on 'Cannibalism in Prehistory' and there are hundreds of results. Just like everything else on the internet, you have to be cautious about what to believe, but there is a significant amount of legitimate information about cannibalism in Prehistoric America.

What we may never know is whether or not cannibalism was done for sustenance or ritual or both. 
As far as sustenance is concerned, humans are not that nutritious. James Cole of the University of Brighton determined that an adult human male of 66 kilograms contained 144,000 total calories. Of this, 32,000 of these calories came from skeletal muscle. In comparison, the skeletal muscle of a mammoth contains 3,600,000 calories, a horse 200,100 calories, a red deer 163,680 calories and a Saiga antelope 31,500 (similar to a human male).
Figure Three - Illustration by Dami Lee
The second reason for cannibalism might have been a part of a ritual. Prehistoric humans were superstitious of things they knew little about. We see this in their art. We know from historical accounts that the religions of some historical Indian tribes believed that it was possible to capture an animal's spirit by eating its flesh. Perhaps, some prehistoric people believed the same thing about human cuisine. Or perhaps, cannibalism came from a need to dominate. In my latest book, CROW and the CAVE, I explain my reasons for using cannibalism. Read CROW and the CAVE to see what I think.
Figure Four - CLICK to Order CROW and the CAVE
 


   

Wednesday, February 21, 2018

CROW and the CAVE - It's a Family Affair


CLICK for John Bradford Branney Books
I published the first book of my prehistoric adventure series in April 2013. This thriller was entitled SHADOWS ON THE TRAIL. Since April 2013, I have written three more books in this prehistoric adventure series about a real-to-life prehistoric culture that lived in western North America from 10,900 to 10,200 years ago. This prehistoric culture we now call Folsom.

One of the things I have done in my prehistoric adventure books is to link a few of the characters from book to book, that is, the characters who have survived from book to book. SHADOWS ON THE TRAIL started out with characters named Chayton and Tarca Sapa and Wiyaka and Namid and bad man Ei Hanit. In my latest addition to the series entitled CROW and the CAVE, I bring back Chayton's son as a main character. His name is Hoka. Many of you will remember him from the books GHOSTS OF THE HEART and WINDS OF EDEN.
Paleoindians in SHADOWS on the TRAIL country. 


Below is a short passage from CROW and the CAVE where I begin to reintroduce Hoka to my readers.

North of Paytah and his people, a lone hunter trekked northward, walking through the windblown hills of the North Country. The hunter’s hike mirrored the flood plain bordering a small meandering stream. The hunter was heading to a place where this water was born, a sacred spring called wakan ya in a valley called Páhu Ósmaka or Skull Valley. A chilly wind blew out of the northwest, a reminder that winter was on its way. The first snow of the season had already fallen, and a few isolated snowdrifts on north-facing slopes still survived. The hunter knew the cold, he had survived forty some winters in the North Country. Even though he was prepared for this harsh climate, the frigid wind chilled his bones. Over his elk skin shirt and leggings, the hunter wore a coat made from the hide of a bison. The hunter wore the bison wool inward, facing his body. A long piece of hide tied around the waist secured the coat. Over moccasin-covered feet, the hunter wore sock-like boots with deer fur facing inward. On top of his head, the hunter wore a cap made from the skin of a coyote. The hunter wore the cap low across his brow. His people called him Hoka. His blood father was known as Kangi and his blood mother was Tonkala. When Hoka was a child, a bear killed his blood father. A hunter called Chayton then raised Hoka with Tonkala.  

For more on Hoka and the Folsom People, you can read the book series the SHADOWS ON THE TRAIL TRILOGY. 
CLICK this LINK to TAKE an ADVENTURE

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Part II - The "Spark" for CROW and the CAVE, an adventure by John Bradford Branney

Figure One - Crow and the Cave by John Bradford Branney. Release Date March 8, 2018.
In case you missed Part One of this blog posting, here is the link to Part One. LINK to Part I of "Spark" and CROW and the CAVE.

In Part One, horned cattle were bludgeoning my German Shepherd Madd Maxx and me. I was pinned to the ground by the horns and hooves of an orange-colored devil cow and Madd Maxx was battling the rest of the herd. The story continues below.  

Every time the devil cow stepped on my legs, I cried out. The pain was excruciating. I could not breathe. I was wheezing, and I was not getting enough oxygen to satisfy my body’s needs. My fractured ribs felt like someone had impaled me with a spear! While the halfton cow ground me into the dirt, she rocked her head back and forth trying to impale me with her horns. At the same time, she was walking all over me. My entire body was on fire. I felt immersed in hot lava. The pain was beyond tolerance. I was bleeding all over the pasture.
Figure Two - The orange and white devil cow whose mission was to eliminate the threat. 
Lying there in agony while suffocating on dust, I had an epiphany. I realized this devil cow was not going to let up on her attack until I was dead. If I fought her, she would kill him. I stopped moving and went limp. I played dead. I laid there motionless in the dirt and the blood and the manure. That was hard to do. I was in extreme pain. At first, the horned beast did not buy it. She pawed at me with her hooves, trying to roll me over, but I spread my legs just far enough to prevent her from rolling me over. I had my arms wrapped around my head like a helmet. She shoved me with her horned skull, but I did not budge. I remember feeling her wet breath against my neck as she sniffed me for life. Every time the devil cow stepped on me, I wanted to scream, but I held it all in.

I finally satisfied the devil cow. She was convinced that I was no longer a threat. She rejoined the herd, leaving me lying there in my own blood, covered in dirt and cow dung. I was in very bad shape. All I wanted to do was lie there, but I heard my dog, sometimes barking, sometimes yelping. I struggled to my knees. The pain was beyond anything I had ever experienced. My left leg took the worst of the beating. It would not straighten. I spotted Madd Maxx. The cows were circling him in a cloud of dust. Funny how the mind works under the strangest of circumstances. I remember thinking how the scene reminded me of an old western movie with the Indians circling the cover wagons, but in this case, it was cows circling Madd Maxx. I crawled through the circling cows. Occasionally one of them bumped into me, but I kept going. I grabbed Madd Maxx by his furry neck and pulled him from the circle. Then, I collapsed on the ground.
Figure Three - A portion of the rest of the herd. Glad to have a fence between us. 

Madd Maxx was in very bad shape. The cattle had annihilated him. The herd had ripped off his steel training collar and long lead rope. He was bleeding profusely from his mouth and he had bloody patches of matted fur across most of his body. His ferocious German Shepherd bark was now whimpers of pain. I pulled him away from the herd. I still could not breathe. I was choking, exhausted, and in agony. My gums were bleeding and my front teeth were loose. I had bit my tongue and it was bleeding. My legs and back felt like someone had dipped me in molten steel. I could not stand. Crawling was its own challenge. The shredded backpack still hung from my back by one frayed strap. Madd Maxx and I sat there on the prairie, humbled and conquered.

Then, the strangest thing happened. The cows lined up in front of us. I could not believe it. I guess they thought we still were not convinced of their superiority or maybe I had eaten too many hamburgers in my lifetime. I don’t know why. The orange and white devil cow stood directly in front of me, no further than five feet away. I heard her breathing and watched her chew her cud. Her eyes were on me. I knew I was not walking anywhere so I commanded Madd Maxx to run for the vehicle. He needed no further encouragement. He took off, half limping and half trotting with his tail firmly placed between his legs. He had no fight left in him. He plowed through the strands of a barbed wire fence that separated this pasture from the next. He made it to our vehicle without further incident. Now, it was my turn. I stood up. I remember screaming in pain as I tried to straighten my legs. Every nerve in my body was screaming out. I balanced myself on my right leg, my halfway useful leg. The devil cow stood between me and the vehicle. She lowered her head and smashed into me, knocking me backwards several feet and onto the ground. That is the last thing I remember.
Figure Four - While I was dealing with the orange and white devil cow, Madd Maxx dealt with the herd. 

I do not know how long I laid in the pasture. When I woke up, I was freezing. The temperature had dropped. I would never survive a night on the prairie. I had to get out of there. Pulling myself along on hands and damaged knees, I crawled to the vehicle. The remains of the backpack drooped down in front of my chest, but I was not going to stop and take it off. Not while I was in that pasture. I spotted Madd Maxx at the back of the vehicle, waiting for me. He was ready to get the heck out of Dodge. I loaded him up and drove to the ranch house. I was still wearing sunglasses, but one of the lenses was gone. I honked the horn at the ranch house. I opened my vehicle door and fell to the ground. That’s where I stayed. Sometime later, flight for life shuttled me to a trauma center in Colorado while Madd Maxx made an emergency visit to the vet. That was what happened to me and Madd Maxx on December 3, 2016, a day before my sixty-second birthday. Experience cannot get more real than that. Climb aboard my time machine. I have the dial set for 8700 B.C.

I hope you enjoy Crow and the Cave.


Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Part I - The "Spark" for CROW and the CAVE, an Adventure by John Bradford Branney


CLICK to PREORDER for 10% DISCOUNT

My latest book CROW and the CAVE will be released March 8, 2018. In advance of that release date, I want to give you a little background on how this book came about. The passage below is the first part in a two part blog posting that describes the events leading up to my writing CROW and the CAVE.  


As an author, my historical fiction originates from research, real-life experiences, and an active imagination. Since many of my books are about Prehistoric America, I rely a lot on documented archaeological evidence. However, on December 3, 2016, I had a real-life experience that changed my life and I decided to adapt this encounter to my latest prehistoric adventure entitled Crow and the Cave.

Our German Shepherd Madd Maxx and I were prehistoric artifact hunting on a ranch in northern
Colorado when a herd of horned cattle decided they did not care for Madd Maxx. These cattle must have thought that Madd Maxx was a predator, like a wolf or a coyote. One of the horned beasts decided to remove the predator from the pasture. She lowered her head and rammed into Madd
Madd Maxx
Maxx, sending the one hundred-pound shepherd flying. I intervened between Madd Maxx and the orange-colored beast and paid the price. The horned devil that just launched Madd Maxx into inner space came after me, ramming her skull into my chest. Not having other options, I grabbed the cow by the horns and hung on for dear life. She shoved me backwards across the pasture, picking up speed as we went along. I concluded that hanging on to her horns was not going to end well for me, so I let go, and she ran right over the top of me. Ouch! She knocked the wind out of me. I was in pain and I could not breathe. Later, I found out that I had sustained three broken ribs and a bruised lung. I remember hearing Madd Maxx barking which was a good sign. He was still alive. I staggered to my feet like a fallen boxer rising for an eight count. Before I could straighten up, the horned devil plowed into me. One year later, I still remember that teeth-rattling jolt when her massive skull smashed into my back. I went down hard. I later found out I had sustained kidney, liver and adrenal gland damage. If I had any oxygen in my lungs to start with, it was all gone. I tried to crawl away, but the devil cow was on me, pinning me to the ground with her skull and horns, swinging her head from side to side, trying to hook me with her horns. Fortunately, I was wearing a backpack filled with bulky winter clothes. The devil cow ended up destroying the backpack, but wearing it saved my life. I had been carrying a metal walking stick that she also destroyed. As she mauled me, I remember seeing a huge dust cloud rising above the pasture. I was drowning in a sea of dust. The entire herd was on the war path. While I was trying to escape with my life, so was Madd Maxx, and he had the rest of the herd to contend with. I fought to breathe, but every time I took a breath, the cow slammed into my back.

As I laid there getting bludgeoned by this beast, I felt relieved when I heard Madd Maxx. I knew that if I heard him, he was still alive and if I was going to save him, I first had to save myself. I yelled for help, but that was futile. I was in the middle of nowhere and my yell had no energy, whatsoever. I
Madd Maxx
fought to escape, but the horned beast kept smashing into my back. She walked all over my legs and back with her sharp hooves. I swear it felt like she was kneading bread on my legs like some massive hooved cat. The more I resisted, the more aggressive the horned beast was. I wrapped my arms around my head, hoping to protect my skull from her horns and hooves. She had already loosened my front teeth. I remember thinking that I was going to "die by cow". I understand that we all die of some cause, sooner or later, but “death by cow”?

Based on the above narrative, you can see that Madd Maxx and I are in quite a pickle. You will have to wait until Part Two of the blog posting to see how we get out of it. Then, in subsequent blog postings, I will give you a taste or two about my prehistoric adventure CROW and the CAVE.    


CLICK to preorder CROW and the CAVE for 10% Discount

CLICK for Part Two of the "Spark".

Thursday, November 9, 2017

SHADOWS ON THE TRAIL - Allen or Frederick Projectile Points?


Figure 1 -  High Plains Allen and / or Frederick projectile points. Which are which?
Longest point is 3.25 inches long. John Branney Collection.   
After the stemmed projectile points of the Cody Complex, an abrupt change took place in projectile point technology on the High Plains. A series of lanceolate-shaped projectile points with parallel-oblique flaking came into existence. Instead of stems, these new projectile points had indented or concave bases. There is no doubt that the Late Paleoindians deliberately chose indented or concave bases. After all, why not? An indented base on a projectile point fits well in the haft of a spear, you might say it fits as snug as a bug in a rug. During the Late Paleoindian timeframe on the High Plains there was a plethora of different projectile point types with indented bases, such as Allen and Frederick and Andersen and Angostura and Lusk. These different projectile point types only adds to the confusion.   

Figure 2CLICK to JOIN the ADVENTURE
There are two opposing factions when it comes to projectile point typology; lumpers and splitters.

A "lumper" is an individual who defines projectile points into broad categories with plenty of room to accommodate variation and differences found in a group of projectile points. A lumper believes that more is less when it comes to projectile point typology. A lumper tries to see similarities in projectile points, not differences. Lumpers recognize that Paleoindians and other prehistoric peoples did not have  blueprints for making projectile points and that there might had been variation in projectile points within the same prehistoric culture. A lumper tries to place these projectile point variants into existed projectile point types, if possible.  

By contrast, a "splitter" is an individual who uses precise definitions of projectile point types and creates new categories to classify examples that differ in critical ways. A splitter focuses more on differences in projectile points, than similarities. If the splitter notes a wide enough variation from an existing projectile point type, they might propose a new type. A splitter believes that more is better when it comes to projectile point types.

The bottom line is that lumpers group projectile points into broad categories while splitters divide projectile points into smaller categories. I have a confession to make. I am biased when it comes to lumping and splitting. Philosophically, I am a lumper. I believe there should be plenty of variation allowed in projectile point types to accommodate knapping, material, quality, style and dimensional differences. It is my opinion that “splitters” have carved the turkey meat too thin and we have ended up with too many projectile point types. 
Figure 3 - What do we have here?
2.6 inch long and surface found
in Wyoming. John Branney
Collection. 

Paleoindians followed weapons tradition by handing down verbal recipes on how to make projectile points from generation to generation. Even with verbal instruction, there was many opportunities for variation. There can be tribe isolation, material, knapping skills, workmanship standards, and differing levels of attention.

Nothing is more confusing than High Plains, Late Paleoindian indented base projectile point typology (say that with a mouth full of bubblegum). Late Paleoindian indented base projectile point typology includes Allen, Frederick, Lusk, Andersen, and Angostura points. I am missing some, I am sure.  

Each of these individual projectile point types have similarities and differences with other projectile point types. If anyone tries to tell you that they have Late Paleoindian projectile point typology figured out, you have my permission to laugh at them. Every day, I see people call a projectile point this while another person calls an almost identical projectile point that. It makes me wonder if the same prehistoric culture made both or we have a copycat thing going on between prehistoric cultures.
Figure 4 - 1.7 inch long surface find from
Colorado. What is the projectile point type?
John Branney Collection.  


Let me provide an example of what we face with Late Paleoindian projectile point types: I will be looking at only two types, Allen and Frederick.

Figure 5 - University of
Wyoming anthropologist
William Mulloy. 
A surface collector of artifacts named Jimmy Allen discovered a Paleoindian bison kill site in the Laramie Basin of Wyoming. In 1959, University of Wyoming anthropologist William Mulloy (Figure 5)excavated the James Allen site and recovered thirty fragmentary projectile points, all of which had similar shapes. The projectile points were unnotched and lanceolate-shaped with indented (concave) bases and rounded corners. Dr. Mulloy named the new projectile point Allen after the finder of the site, Jimmy Allen.  

In Jeb Taylor's book (2006), Jeb described Allen points as lanceolate-shaped points with carefully executed diagonal flaking and pronounced basal concavity. In his book, Greg Perino (1985) added to diagonal flaking, basal thinning, rounded basal corners, and side and basal edge grinding as common for Allen points.  

One important point that I wish to make is that not all Allen points have diagonal flaking and not all diagonal flaked projectile points are Allen points!

Figure 6 - Cynthia Irwin-
Williams. 
Cynthia Irwin–Williams (Figure 6) and her brother Henry Irwin named a new projectile point type at the Hell Gap site in east central Wyoming. They called it Frederick after the landowner. Jeb Taylor described Frederick points as diagonally flaked, just like Allen points. Greg Perino added that Frederick points had rounded corners and side / basal grinding, just like Allen points. Jeb proposed that Frederick points were thicker and had straighter bases than Allen points and that based on his study of the original projectile points from both James Allen and Hell Gap sites, he believed there was enough difference to warrant two separate projectile point types.

Not everyone agrees that Allen and Frederick are two separate projectile point types. Henry Irwin, one of the original investigators at the Hell Gap site, once stated to George Frison that the Frederick points from the Hell Gap site were basically the same as Allen points from the James Allen site. Personally, I believe that both Allen and Frederick points are variations of the same theme and are essentially the same projectile point type. This statement takes on more weight when we recognize that Allen and Frederick overlapped in both time and space.   

Irwin-Williams et al (1973) determined that the duration of Frederick at Hell Gap lasted from approximately 8,400 to 8,000 years BP while recent dating techniques at the James Allen bison kill site place the event sometime around 8,405 years BP (Knudson and Kornfeld 2007).  

After seeing what some people are calling Allen and other people are calling Frederick I am more confused than ever. Quite frankly, I don’t see a difference between the two projectile point types. Take a look at Figure one. Which points are Allen and which points are Frederick.   


Irwin-Williams, Cynthia, Henry T. Irwin, George Agogino, and C Vance Haynes
1973    Hell Gap: Paleo-Indian occupation on the High Plains. Plains Anthropologist  18(59):40-53.    

Knudson, Ruth Ann, and Marcel Kornfeld 
2007    A New Date for the James Allen Site, Laramie Basin, Wyoming. Current Research in the Pleistocene 24:112-114. 

Perino, Gregory
1985    Selected Preforms, Points, and Knives of the North American Indians, Volume I.  Points and Barbs Press, Idabel, Okla.  

Taylor, Jeb
2006      Projectile points of the High Plains. Sheridan Books, Chelsea, MI.